Search for: "Milacron Holdings Corp" Results 1 - 2 of 2
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Merit Decision: For Those Who Still Believe There is Such a Thing as an Employer Intentional Tort, Speak Now or Forever Hold Your Peace. Hoyle v. DTJ Ents., Inc.
21 Mar 2015, 10:16 am by MBettman
Safety-Kleen Corp, 61 Ohio St.3d 624 (1991) (When an employee seeks damages resulting from an act or omission committed by the employer with the intent to injure, the claim arises outside of the employment relationship, and the workers’ compensation system does not preempt the employee’s cause of action.) [read post]
Legally Speaking Ohio - http://www.legallyspeakingohio.com
General GWiR 13 February 2009 from IP Think Tank
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(Afro-IP)   Europe Advocate General opines advertisement comparing perfume to L’Oreal’s did not infringe trade marks; translation issue: L’Oréal v Bellure (Out-Law) (IPKat) (Class 46) (IPKat) (Class 46) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) Advocate General opines in Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagblades Forening concerning the storing and printing of small amounts of text extract from newspapers (IPKat), (IPKat) European Parliament backs… [read post]
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/ipthinktank.blog